Sponsored Links:
One critic from a noted media house has given 'zero' rating for the movie Zanjeer 2.0, while his counterparts including a big TV channel like NDTV, big news paper like Times Of India has given 4 and 3 stars respectively. At the same time completely movie buffs like MTV and Filmfare too have given 3-4 ratings for the flick and praised Ram Charan's acting to the core. So, why is this big difference?
The 'zero' star reviewer has felt that South Mega hero Charan's looks and acts as wooden, but how come other top critics and reviewers felt he is awesome as a debutant in Hindi movies. Many star critics like Taran Adarsh have directly taken it to their twitter to say that Ram Charan is extremely talented. But some particular people wrote that he is next best to worst. Well, an actor cannot satisfy all the 100s of audience watching it, but at least film reviewers and critics should be aware of what they are writing and commenting.
Mega fans who are observing all this from a close tent are simply laughing at the happenings. 'National Media lost its credibility by giving zero ratings and four star ratings. Looks like due to a war between themselves (critics) they are crushing the fate of Zanjeer and Charan', a fan said. 'How come the same critics who praised Charan after watching Magadheera now rated him as wooden?' they asked.
Sponsored Links:
.jpg)
Posts
0 comments